Honeybee PlanetVac vs Maxar SSL 1300
Head-to-head comparison of NASA JPL Honeybee PlanetVac and Maxar Technologies Maxar SSL 1300. Updated 2026.
Last updated: May 14, 2026
Overall Score
75.8/ 100
Honeybee PlanetVac
NASA JPL
76.4/ 100
Maxar SSL 1300
Maxar Technologies
Score Breakdown
78
Performance84
80
Reliability82
72
Ease of Use55
70
Intelligence80
82
Value68
65
Ecosystem78
85
Safety85
68
Design72
Specs Comparison
| Spec | Honeybee PlanetVac | Maxar SSL 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $15,000,000 | $150,000,000 |
| Method | Pneumatic lofting | — |
| Mass Kg | 2 | 3500 |
| Heritage | IM-1 lunar mission | — |
| Surfaces | Regolith, soil, dust | — |
| Moving Parts | 0 | — |
| Sample Grams | 200 | — |
| Arms | — | 2 |
| Orbit | — | GEO serviceable |
| Platform | — | SSL 1300 bus |
| Applications | — | Inspection, refueling, repair |
| Design Life Years | — | 15 |
Buyer Intelligence
| Metric | Honeybee PlanetVac | Maxar SSL 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor Health Score | — | — |
| 5-Year TCO Estimate | $21,000,000 | $210,000,000 |
| Annual Maintenance | — | — |
| Support Model | — | — |
| Safety Certifications | — | — |