Stryker Mako SmartRobotics (Hip) vs Zimmer Biomet ROSA Spine
Head-to-head comparison of Stryker Stryker Mako SmartRobotics (Hip) and Zimmer Biomet Zimmer Biomet ROSA Spine. Updated 2026.
Last updated: May 9, 2026
Overall Score
83.4/ 100
Stryker Mako SmartRobotics (Hip)
Stryker
83.1/ 100
Zimmer Biomet ROSA Spine
Zimmer Biomet
Score Breakdown
88
Performance87
86
Reliability87
78
Ease of Use78
86
Intelligence86
70
Value67
82
Ecosystem79
90
Safety92
78
Design84
Specs Comparison
| Spec | Stryker Mako SmartRobotics (Hip) | Zimmer Biomet ROSA Spine |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,200,000 | $1,100,000 |
| Guidance | Haptic AccuStop boundaries | stereotactic robotic arm |
| Planning | CT-based 3D AccuPlan | intraoperative 3D |
| Application | Total hip arthroplasty | — |
| Installations | 4000 | — |
| Accuracy | — | 98% Gertzbein A |
| Tracking | — | optical + robotic |
| Clearance | — | FDA 510(k) |
| Procedure | — | spinal fusion, neuro |
Buyer Intelligence
| Metric | Stryker Mako SmartRobotics (Hip) | Zimmer Biomet ROSA Spine |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor Health Score | — | — |
| 5-Year TCO Estimate | $1,680,000 | $1,540,000 |
| Annual Maintenance | — | — |
| Support Model | — | — |
| Safety Certifications | — | — |